Skip to main content

How exposure to mass media influences audiences in politically-significant ways

Mass media plays a key role in shaping political attitudes, knowledge, and behaviors, acting as the main way individuals receive information about politics. While media exposure can have positive effects, like increasing political engagement and knowledge, it can also lead to negative outcomes, like reinforcing misinformation and polarization. This impact can be seen most commonly from traditional news outlets, but the same effects can be seen on social platforms like TikTok as well.

One of the primary benefits of mass media is its potential to enhance political knowledge and empathy. According to Dunaway and Graber, political scientist Daniel Lerner discussed a personality trait called “empathic capacity.” This theory posited that when media present new concepts, audiences empathize with what is happening in the story and try to imitate it. An example they gave was when audience members view a news piece about slum dwellers and the accommodations they live in, viewers will apply that to their own lives and empathize with the material.

Mass media can enhance people’s political knowledge by giving them factual information in the news and social media, but the mass media also creates empathy, interest, and understanding for unfamiliar experiences, connecting people with vastly different lives and stories. Once the media kickstarts this interest, people are more likely to want to increase their knowledge on the subjects, increasing empathy, understanding and political knowledge. A recent example we saw of this phenomenon was during the #BlackLivesMatter movement that gained momentum in 2020. Mass media widely portrayed the actions of activists involved in the protests and got thousands of people involved in the cause, encouraging them to learn more about issues facing Black Americans and participate politically. Activists from across the country were able to use TikTok to communicate and share information about the BLM protests in their areas, as well as provide mutual aid and community support, even from thousands of miles away.

However, mass media certainly has a negative impact on our democracy too. One major concern is the spread of misinformation and “fake news,” especially from the far right. Studies have shown that false news stories spread more quickly on Twitter and other social media platforms than true stories, often influencing voters' perceptions and behaviors. TikTok has a severe issue with political misinformation as well, especially impacting young people who haven't learned to properly fact check information yet. This highlights how media, particularly when unregulated or biased, can affect the public's understanding of political issues. Polarization is also a negative outcome of mass media exposure. Major media outlets like MSNBC and Fox News emphasize certain political views and shut down others, leading viewers of the channels to strongly believe their pre-existing ideas. The echo chamber this generates leads to more division and less intelligent conversation among Americans.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

How are candidates capitalizing on the prevailing narratives of this year's election?

In the 2024 General Election, a prevailing narrative that has taken hold is the fight for women’s reproductive rights and immigration. Kamala Harris’ campaign has highlighted her intentions to reinstate Roe v. Wade and statewide access to abortions and reproductive healthcare, while Donald Trump’s campaign is sticking with the recently-adopted “leave it up to the states” motto. While Harris’ platform focuses on women’s issues, Trump’s campaign is still focusing on illegal immigration and the “border crisis.” Many of Trump’s ads attack migrants and Harris’ policies as vice president, calling her the “border czar” and using foreboding music to make viewers associate immigration with feelings of unease and distrust. That can be seen in this advertisement , as well as many of the other ads from his team. Meanwhile, the Harris/Walz campaign has taken the platform that women have the right to choose and Roe v. Wade protections must be reinstated. Her ads take a gentle, empathetic approach to...
2 comments
Read more

Online presence: Democrats versus Republicans

The Democratic Party and Republican Party websites and social media pages both strategically employ charged content such as text, colors, and symbols, to promote their goals to the audience. The websites serve as important platforms for political communication, each employing distinct strategies to convey their messages and engage with voters. For a comparison, both websites heavily employ their designated colors (blue and red, respectively) to drive home the point that they are Democratic and Republican. Blue is a psychologically calming color, while red symbolizes strength and urgency.  When you open the Democratic Party website , you are immediately shown a full-screen pop up that reads, in all caps, “TIME IS RUNNING OUT,” in reference to the fact that there are approximately three weeks until the election ends. The homepage contains messages to “fight for a brighter, more equal future” and includes a tab at the top for a Spanish translation. There is also a wide photo of Kamala...
Post a Comment
Read more

Trump's battle against "Washington elites" is neverending

Corina  Lacatus’ study Populism and the 2016 American Election: Evidence from Official Press Releases and Twitter defines populism as “a type of political rhetoric predicated on the moral vilification of elites, who are perceived as self-serving and undemocratic.” Lacatus identifies Trump as the populist candidate of 2016, with him labeling Democrats as the elites, saying they aren’t helping the white middle class of America. From what I can gather, Trump would actually be considered one of the true “elites,” seeing as he’s a “self-serving and undemocratic” billionaire. Lacatis said no matter the ideological leaning of the candidate, populists promise to upset the status quo with one that centralizes the people, not the elites. Trump’s wide appeal to the white middle class definitely took a populist approach in 2016 and may have secured him the election.  In my opinion, the two most interesting findings in Lacatus’ study are the differences in the three candidates’ uses of o...
Post a Comment
Read more