Skip to main content

Strategic communication on TikTok

Strategic communication is the method by which people in power, at least their public relations teams, control media narratives to spin stories in favor of their employer. This can apply to businesses, celebrities, and politicians alike.There are four components of strategic communication: message shaping, message salience, message credibility, and message framing. How do we see these strategies utilized in the modern day, especially on social media platforms like TikTok?

Shaping is when public relations representatives generate simple messages and themes to show the audience, which the audience then absorbs and recalls when the specific issues are brought up. On TikTok, this can be seen by brands and politicians using hashtags and short campaign slogans to succinctly share their message to the audience.

Message salience refers to the importance of repetition in getting one's message across. Communication channels need to be inundated with the simple messages to ensure they reach the target audience before competing messages. This can be seen on TikTok by politicians using the same soundbites from speeches and interviews, as well as using the same slogan or catchphrase, to establish their "brand" with the target audience.

Political actors and their spin teams establish credibility by using “authoritative settings and recognized sources” to deliver their messages, following the message up with endorsements from notable figures. This has become a hot topic on TikTok in recent weeks, with rumors flying around that the GOP and DNC are discreetly paying famous TikTokers to promote their political parties and encourage young people to vote a certain way this November. When notable figures like celebrities and influencers endorse a candidate or party, it can influence their followers to do the same.

Finally, framing is how message management manipulates journalists and the media. Political actors deliver their message with a specific script, generate good soundbites, and public relations people add the right spin to influence how journalists cover the message, therefore impacting how citizens react to it. To effectively frame candidates in a good light on TikTok can be difficult for PR teams because of how interactive the platform is. If people can tell a scene is staged or even false, they will point it out, losing the candidate some credibility and trust. Public relations professionals must harness the platform's unique dynamics in order to influence how candidates and issues and perceived and discussed, sometimes bypassing journalists entirely.



Comments

  1. This analysis captures the essence of strategic communication and its adaptation to modern platforms like TikTok. The four components—shaping, salience, credibility, and framing—are increasingly relevant as brands and political figures compete for attention in a fast-paced digital landscape. TikTok's algorithm-driven nature amplifies message salience and credibility, as repetition and endorsements from influencers can quickly establish narratives among younger audiences. However, framing is particularly challenging on this platform, given its transparency and interactivity, requiring PR teams to craft authentic, engaging, and believable content to maintain credibility and trust. This evolution underscores the necessity for tailored strategies in the ever-changing world of digital media.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Trump's battle against "Washington elites" is neverending

Corina  Lacatus’ study Populism and the 2016 American Election: Evidence from Official Press Releases and Twitter defines populism as “a type of political rhetoric predicated on the moral vilification of elites, who are perceived as self-serving and undemocratic.” Lacatus identifies Trump as the populist candidate of 2016, with him labeling Democrats as the elites, saying they aren’t helping the white middle class of America. From what I can gather, Trump would actually be considered one of the true “elites,” seeing as he’s a “self-serving and undemocratic” billionaire. Lacatis said no matter the ideological leaning of the candidate, populists promise to upset the status quo with one that centralizes the people, not the elites. Trump’s wide appeal to the white middle class definitely took a populist approach in 2016 and may have secured him the election.  In my opinion, the two most interesting findings in Lacatus’ study are the differences in the three candidates’ uses of o...

How exposure to mass media influences audiences in politically-significant ways

Mass media plays a key role in shaping political attitudes, knowledge, and behaviors, acting as the main way individuals receive information about politics. While media exposure can have positive effects, like increasing political engagement and knowledge, it can also lead to negative outcomes, like reinforcing misinformation and polarization. This impact can be seen most commonly from traditional news outlets, but the same effects can be seen on social platforms like TikTok as well. One of the primary benefits of mass media is its potential to enhance political knowledge and empathy. According to Dunaway and Graber, political scientist Daniel Lerner discussed a personality trait called “empathic capacity.” This theory posited that when media present new concepts, audiences empathize with what is happening in the story and try to imitate it. An example they gave was when audience members view a news piece about slum dwellers and the accommodations they live in, viewers will apply that ...

How are candidates capitalizing on the prevailing narratives of this year's election?

In the 2024 General Election, a prevailing narrative that has taken hold is the fight for women’s reproductive rights and immigration. Kamala Harris’ campaign has highlighted her intentions to reinstate Roe v. Wade and statewide access to abortions and reproductive healthcare, while Donald Trump’s campaign is sticking with the recently-adopted “leave it up to the states” motto. While Harris’ platform focuses on women’s issues, Trump’s campaign is still focusing on illegal immigration and the “border crisis.” Many of Trump’s ads attack migrants and Harris’ policies as vice president, calling her the “border czar” and using foreboding music to make viewers associate immigration with feelings of unease and distrust. That can be seen in this advertisement , as well as many of the other ads from his team. Meanwhile, the Harris/Walz campaign has taken the platform that women have the right to choose and Roe v. Wade protections must be reinstated. Her ads take a gentle, empathetic approach to...