Skip to main content

Revisiting "Harvest of Shame": How social media would transform the narrative

CBS and Murrow’s “Harvest of Shame” is one of the best examples of advocacy journalism in history. From a journalistic standpoint, the documentary is well-filmed, contains several hard-hitting and valuable interviews, and a good balance of emotions and facts to educate and influence the audience. People from different sides of the issues were given chances to speak. The documentary opened up with harrowing accounts and heartbreaking interviews with some of the migrant workers and ended with a succinct call to action from Murrow, urging Americans to fight for the migrant workers because they don’t have the political power to advocate for themselves.

    “Harvest of Shame” is a perfect work of advocacy journalism that served to educate Americans on the plight of migrant workers and uplift the group. Airing the documentary right after Thanksgiving was also a genius decision, because as Murrow said, the food on America’s tables would not be there if not for the overlooked labor of the migrant workers. The documentary holds up today, but it is clearly dated. If CBS were to revisit "Harvest of Shame" 60 years later and put out the documentary today, how would social media and modern technology transform the documentary?

    At its core, "Harvest of Shame" aimed to shed light on the injustices faced by migrant laborers—a mission that remains especially relevant today. A modern version would still use interviews with migrants and their families to evoke empathy and raise awareness about labor rights and social justice issues. The firsthand accounts from workers, as well as interviews with politicians and lobbyists, would serve to influence the audience to stand up for migrants' rights, in a similar fashion to how CBS did in the original documentary.

    Obviously, if the documentary was shot today, it would not be shot on static cameras in black and white. Today’s filmmakers have access to advanced technology, such as high-definition cameras and cell phones, which could gripping visuals of the agricultural landscape and the daily lives of workers. The documentary could even incorporate personal videos shot from the cell phones of migrant workers that show the experiences firsthand. The dynamic, higher quality camera work would serve to further immerse the audience in the story, and personal videos would form an even deeper bond from viewer to subject. 

    Social media, particularly TikTok, would play an interesting role in how CBS would produce the documentary today. CBS could use its social media presence on TikTok to share short, impactful clips from the documentary to reach viewers that might not have tuned in on television. These clips could even go viral, reaching a broader audience and broadening conversations around the issue of migrants' rights. Additionally, taking advantage of the "social" aspect of social media, CBS could add user-generated aspects to the story, encouraging viewers to share their personal stories or thoughts on the issues. 

    If CBS were to revisit "Harvest of Shame" today, the documentary would certainly retain its mission to highlight the struggles faced by migrant laborers, but the storytelling methods would be somewhat different, given the technological advances. With better cameras and the integration of social media, a modern version would engage audiences in new, more personal ways. By harnessing the power of social media, CBS could amplify the documentary’s impact, making the issues surrounding migrant labor resonate even more strongly in today’s world. The spirit of advocacy remains unchanged; it’s the medium and message that have transformed. 

Comments

  1. Hi Emma! I really like how you tied our discussion board to your blog post. That is a great way to expand on what we are already learning. I think if CBS were to revisit the "Harvest of Shame" today, we would see social media become engulfed in this topic. Further, we even saw something similar with the BLM movement and how influencers brought forth a lot of awareness with the amount of followers. During this time, many saw their favorite influencers feeling strongly about BLM and so they reciprocated the black screen posts. It seems that if the public is well-informed about a topic, then it is human nature to advocate for reform and a better life for those that are being unjustly hurt. We definitely live in a society that relies heavily on social media, which can often be bad for our democracy. However, when it comes to spreading the word on important issues that require the public to speak up, it can be incredibly helpful!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Harris vs. Trump: Weekly TikTok Tactics

  @realdonaldtrump vs. @KamalaHQ on TikTok: Comparing analytics and social media strategy over a one-week period Sunday, August 18 - Sunday, August 25 Total number of videos posted: @KamalaHQ: 45 @realdonaldtrump: 1 Total (combined) views on new videos: @KamalaHQ: 53.6 M @realdonaldtrump: 5.4 M In this week's news, the Democratic National Convention ran from August 19 through the 22, receiving mass media coverage due to notable speeches and celebrity guest appearances. Kamala Harris and Tim Walz officially received the Democratic nomination for president and vice president. Because of this publicity, I expected Harris's TikTok to have published more content in the last week when compared to Donald Trump, and I was correct.  Trump's TikTok account only posted one video in the last week. The clip is just 9 seconds long and features the candidate standing in front of a police car, saying America is in decline and, "Nobody is safe, absolutely nobody," promising th...

Memes won Trump the 2016 election; They may be his downfall in 2024

A screenshot of a @KamalaHQ TikTok post from July 22, 2024.   Meme culture has shaped how American politicians operate and communicate with the public since the lead-up to the 2016 presidential election. Then-presidential candidate Donald Trump found himself the subject of meme forums across the internet, from Instagram users mocking his remarks to 4chan users glorifying his image. Rodney Taveira wrote in an article, " While it is of course hyperbolic to claim that memes won Trump the presidency in 2016, they do help explain the enduring passion and nature of his support." Taveira highlighted that internet users, especially those on 4chan and Reddit forums, gravitated towards Trump's campaign because they viewed him as an outsider like themselves. As he pointed out, the Trump campaign in 2016 did not capitalize on Trump's status as a meme, instead letting social media users give his image a life of its own. "Trump was merely an amplifier for the frowned-upon fri...

TikTok in the headlines: What's making the news?

TikTok-related stories in the headlines this week Viral "bank hack" is just plain fraud, warns JP Morgan Chase & Co. Many TikTok users are potentially facing legal consequences after participating in the viral "Chase ATM hack," which is just another term for check fraud, according to JPMorgan, the parent company of Chase Bank. In this TikTok , a woman says her partner was arrested after the couple withdrew $47,500 from a Chase ATM using this "hack."  In the last week, videos were posted by TikTok users, showing them depositing expensive checks at Chase ATMs and then withdrawing a smaller amount of money. Users thought this was a lucky "glitch" in the ATM systems. Unfortunately for them, this is no glitch or life hack. What they did was commit check fraud, which is a criminal offense.  Media publications like CNN and the Wall Street Journal reported on this TikTok scam this week, warning users not to attempt the new, trendy felony currently ...