Skip to main content

How does freedom of the press relate to a TikTok ban?

On this blog, I have previously discussed the U.S. government's attempts to implement a TikTok ban due to concerns over China allegedly using the app to spy on Americans. The potential ban is deeply controversial across partisan lines. Despite the many valid criticisms of the app, people across the world use the platform to share news and firsthand accounts of major events. 

Caitlin Vogus, a senior advisor at Freedom of the Press Foundation, wrote that banning TikTok is unconstitutional and, "could set a precedent that empowers the government to censor or outlaw news outlets, too." She goes on to list the five main reasons why a ban would be against the Constitution. They are as follows: 

  1. Even if the government labels something as foreign propaganda, the First Amendment prevents the government from banning speech. 
  2. Forcing divestment, rather than just banning TikTok, still violates the First Amendment. 
  3. Americans have the right to free speech, and that includes the right to speak using TikTok as a platform. 
  4. The government cannot nullify the First Amendment simply by claiming it's an issue of "national security."
  5. There are other, less oppressive ways to deal with TikTok's various issues. 
“Freedom of the press” can be defined as allowing journalists to report information openly and honestly to the public. The citizens’ right to know is valuable, and a free press knows what is important to the people and relays it to them without barriers. In a truly free press system, journalists and citizens would have free access to worldwide internet platforms to share their messages across the world.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Memes won Trump the 2016 election; They may be his downfall in 2024

A screenshot of a @KamalaHQ TikTok post from July 22, 2024.   Meme culture has shaped how American politicians operate and communicate with the public since the lead-up to the 2016 presidential election. Then-presidential candidate Donald Trump found himself the subject of meme forums across the internet, from Instagram users mocking his remarks to 4chan users glorifying his image. Rodney Taveira wrote in an article, " While it is of course hyperbolic to claim that memes won Trump the presidency in 2016, they do help explain the enduring passion and nature of his support." Taveira highlighted that internet users, especially those on 4chan and Reddit forums, gravitated towards Trump's campaign because they viewed him as an outsider like themselves. As he pointed out, the Trump campaign in 2016 did not capitalize on Trump's status as a meme, instead letting social media users give his image a life of its own. "Trump was merely an amplifier for the frowned-upon fri...
4 comments
Read more

How exposure to mass media influences audiences in politically-significant ways

Mass media plays a key role in shaping political attitudes, knowledge, and behaviors, acting as the main way individuals receive information about politics. While media exposure can have positive effects, like increasing political engagement and knowledge, it can also lead to negative outcomes, like reinforcing misinformation and polarization. This impact can be seen most commonly from traditional news outlets, but the same effects can be seen on social platforms like TikTok as well. One of the primary benefits of mass media is its potential to enhance political knowledge and empathy. According to Dunaway and Graber, political scientist Daniel Lerner discussed a personality trait called “empathic capacity.” This theory posited that when media present new concepts, audiences empathize with what is happening in the story and try to imitate it. An example they gave was when audience members view a news piece about slum dwellers and the accommodations they live in, viewers will apply that ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Trump's battle against "Washington elites" is neverending

Corina  Lacatus’ study Populism and the 2016 American Election: Evidence from Official Press Releases and Twitter defines populism as “a type of political rhetoric predicated on the moral vilification of elites, who are perceived as self-serving and undemocratic.” Lacatus identifies Trump as the populist candidate of 2016, with him labeling Democrats as the elites, saying they aren’t helping the white middle class of America. From what I can gather, Trump would actually be considered one of the true “elites,” seeing as he’s a “self-serving and undemocratic” billionaire. Lacatis said no matter the ideological leaning of the candidate, populists promise to upset the status quo with one that centralizes the people, not the elites. Trump’s wide appeal to the white middle class definitely took a populist approach in 2016 and may have secured him the election.  In my opinion, the two most interesting findings in Lacatus’ study are the differences in the three candidates’ uses of o...
Post a Comment
Read more