Skip to main content

Is TikTok the perfect platform for gonzo journalists?

TikTok is a visual platform that encourages first-person narratives and perspectives, often following "day in the life" and vlog-style content from influencers. In a way, this makes TikTok the perfect platform for modern citizen journalists to practice "gonzo journalism," the style of journalism pioneered by Hunter S. Thompson that makes no claims of objectivity, often having the reporter play a role in the story itself. 

Unlike traditional journalism that relies on neutral, strictly factual statements from reporters and quotations from third parties, gonzo journalism's accuracy comes from reporting the author's personal emotions and experiences. This establishes a close connection between the reporter and the audience, because even if they aren't necessarily objective, they are open and vulnerable about their honest experiences, which some audiences find refreshing. 

As I mentioned above, a popular video format on TikTok takes a "day in the life" approach. This means the subject films their daily life, usually while accomplishing a specific task or going to an event, while they take their phone along to record their experience in detail, sharing their experiences and feelings to the viewer in a way that feels very direct and personal. 

I have seen TikToks of this style following reporters attending conferences, conventions, protests, rallies, and more. Instead of documenting the events in a traditional journalistic way, which would be removing themself from the situation, filming exactly what's going on, and offering nothing but detached facts, they take the audience along with them, describing their thoughts and feelings on the event, what it means to them, and what exactly they are experiencing. 

I think gonzo journalism is a great way to connect with people, specifically young audiences that grew up watching vlog-style content on Youtube. Young influencers-turned-reporters often have a particular cadence and charisma that appeals to a younger audience, speaking to their phone camera like they are on a FaceTime call rather than documenting an important event. This can be a great way to engage young people in political events and happenings; by using young reporters to casually film and describe their own experiences, they are connecting with the audience in a way traditional broadcast and print media simply cannot. 

Comments

  1. I don't know much about Gonzo journalism, but just by reading your post, I also agree that gonzo journalism is best for the younger generation. Most of the younger generation don't know about politics, so I think it would be best if they depend on gonzo journalism until they get fully into politics. I think once they start to understand more about politics, they will rely on traditional journalism, because traditional journalism does provide more accurate information and will give the knowledge that you need.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

How are candidates capitalizing on the prevailing narratives of this year's election?

In the 2024 General Election, a prevailing narrative that has taken hold is the fight for women’s reproductive rights and immigration. Kamala Harris’ campaign has highlighted her intentions to reinstate Roe v. Wade and statewide access to abortions and reproductive healthcare, while Donald Trump’s campaign is sticking with the recently-adopted “leave it up to the states” motto. While Harris’ platform focuses on women’s issues, Trump’s campaign is still focusing on illegal immigration and the “border crisis.” Many of Trump’s ads attack migrants and Harris’ policies as vice president, calling her the “border czar” and using foreboding music to make viewers associate immigration with feelings of unease and distrust. That can be seen in this advertisement , as well as many of the other ads from his team. Meanwhile, the Harris/Walz campaign has taken the platform that women have the right to choose and Roe v. Wade protections must be reinstated. Her ads take a gentle, empathetic approach to...

Online presence: Democrats versus Republicans

The Democratic Party and Republican Party websites and social media pages both strategically employ charged content such as text, colors, and symbols, to promote their goals to the audience. The websites serve as important platforms for political communication, each employing distinct strategies to convey their messages and engage with voters. For a comparison, both websites heavily employ their designated colors (blue and red, respectively) to drive home the point that they are Democratic and Republican. Blue is a psychologically calming color, while red symbolizes strength and urgency.  When you open the Democratic Party website , you are immediately shown a full-screen pop up that reads, in all caps, “TIME IS RUNNING OUT,” in reference to the fact that there are approximately three weeks until the election ends. The homepage contains messages to “fight for a brighter, more equal future” and includes a tab at the top for a Spanish translation. There is also a wide photo of Kamala...

Trump's battle against "Washington elites" is neverending

Corina  Lacatus’ study Populism and the 2016 American Election: Evidence from Official Press Releases and Twitter defines populism as “a type of political rhetoric predicated on the moral vilification of elites, who are perceived as self-serving and undemocratic.” Lacatus identifies Trump as the populist candidate of 2016, with him labeling Democrats as the elites, saying they aren’t helping the white middle class of America. From what I can gather, Trump would actually be considered one of the true “elites,” seeing as he’s a “self-serving and undemocratic” billionaire. Lacatis said no matter the ideological leaning of the candidate, populists promise to upset the status quo with one that centralizes the people, not the elites. Trump’s wide appeal to the white middle class definitely took a populist approach in 2016 and may have secured him the election.  In my opinion, the two most interesting findings in Lacatus’ study are the differences in the three candidates’ uses of o...